“In Britain, the House of Lords has reported that the economic impact of immigration is minimal and has concluded that it ought to be capped. The report is seen as a decisive defeat for the government’s long-held view that immigration boosts the economy by increasing production.
The Lords have found that, while the total size of the economy does rise when there is high net immigration, this does not mean that prosperity as such rises. Per capita GDP remains the same. In other words, the size of the economy rises only to the extent that there are more people in the country than before. The economic benefit of mass immigration is zero.
The social costs, of course, are very considerable. ...
As Pat Buchanan argued brilliantly in The Death of the West, economic history shows that periods of high immigration do not coincide with periods of high economic growth. Japan grew spectacularly in the period 1955 – 1993 but immigration over that time was zero. The periods when America’s prosperity has risen are those when immigration has been low; the economy stalls, by contrast, when it is high.” ...
**
Olímpica covardia e submissão.
Foto tirada do The Brussels Journal
Um comentário:
Caro Vespa:
Tenho na minha posse as fotocópias do livro «O Livro Negro da Descolonização». O preço das fotocópias foi de 10€. Continua interessado?
Em caso afirmativo escreva-me, se faz favor, para o meu email.
Postar um comentário