Zidane 1 fidel 0

“The draft resolution from the Committee on Equal Opportunities for Women and Men says countries should "decriminalise abortion, if they have not already done so." The Committee also recommended that sex education be made mandatory for young people.”

-Do tipo; a partir dos três meses devem os progenitores, para além dos vizinhos, amigos e demais interessados, massajar o clitóris das meninas, e a partir dos 2 anos sujeitarem-se à lavagem cerebral de que a homossexualidade, etc, é normal, aconselhável até ser obrigatória... Quiçá até não se começa a introduzir a ideia de que a pedófila é aceitável...

“Like most international and pan-European bodies, the Council of Europe is known among life and family advocates for its strong secularist bias and support for the full programme of the abortion and pan-sexualist movement and anti-Christian bias.”

“The Council of Europe, not to be confused with the Council of the European Union, which is the EU's legislature, is the body that founded the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, but has no juridical force over EU member states. The Council of Europe, with 47 current member nations, is the oldest European transnational body, founded after WWI with the endorsement of Winston Churchill, among others.”

“"Lesbian and gay people have the same fundamental rights as anyone else," he added.”

-Mais um. O direito de impingir ao resto da sociedade, com a ajuda de muitos, e muitos interesses obscuros, que o comportamento homossexual é normal, restando aos outros o direito de aceitar incondicionalmente. Ou seja, o direito a serem subjugados por uma minoria de comportamento sexual anormal.

EU to force Poland, Malta, Italy to recognize gay “marriage”

“A new law coming into effect today effectively orders the countries of the Union to “facilitate” homosexual partners who have “married” in their home countries and want to live or travel in countries where their unions are not legally recognized.”

“The law is intended to allow EU citizens to move around the Union as freely as they do within their own countries. The directive means that citizens within the EU will no longer be obliged to obtain a residence permit when moving to another member state. When registering in their new country, homosexual couples may use the European Courts to force sovereign countries to recognize their unions.”

“Although only five EU member states have ratified the decision, European justice commissioner Franco Frattini warned national governments that the law was “immediately applicable” – whether ratified or not.”

“... however, such as Poland, Italy and Malta have resisted the push by lobbyists for “gay marriage” and the threat of coercion, becoming a common method of EU politics, is directed against them.”

“Buttlglione said the EU is advancing a leftist “soft totalitarianism,” that “wants to have a state religion. It is an atheist, nihilistic religion - but it is a religion that is obligatory for all.””

O estado a que chegou o ensino neste aterro à beira mar plantado.

Claro que com as mentes iluminadas que têm debitado tantas teorias sobre o ensino e governantes de excepcional craveira, vou ficar espantado se a culpa, por portas e travessas e mais qualquer coisa, não acabará por ser da professora, na totalidade ou em parte, porque tentou tirar a merda do télélé à menina. Quem sabe os sacrifícios que os papás fizeram para que o rebento, possua o invejável status do supérfluo, esquecendo-se do essencial, quiçá, por também eles não o terem, ou por estar fora de moda e retrógrado, ou até por ser antipedagógico.

***

Enganou o estado em cinco milhões

“O Tribunal de Instrução Criminal (TIC) aplicou a medida de coacção mais leve a um empresário argentino que burlou o Estado português em cinco milhões de euros num esquema de IVA em carrossel. “Foram meses de investigação, onde se gastou muito dinheiro dos contribuintes”, disseram ao Correio da Manhã fontes da Polícia Judiciária, que manifestaram indignação pela medida de coacção aplicada,...”

- Concordo plenamente, estamos a falar de bagatelas fiscais. Até porque como se pode ver o homem tem tido um comportamento exemplar.

“O argentino radicado em Espanha há vários anos já cumpriu penas de prisão por tráfico de estupefacientes e posse de arma proibida, em Portugal e em Espanha...”

***

Interessantes as conclusões a que chega sr Henriques Sousa, sobre o preço do barril de petróleo, em Euros.

European Parliament Fines Members for Opposing EU Treaty

“It is not the fact of punishment that annoys Mr. Hannan but the fact that others who indulge in identical activity are never punished for what they do and that such sanctions seem to be reserved for anyone who is either a Eurosceptic or has otherwise questioned the system.”

União Europeia

Vídeo completo aqui ou um excerto abaixo.

Reintrodução da Pena de Morte através da Constituição Europeia?

Biodisel
“Biofuels have been put forward as a means of reducing the greenhouse gas emissions pumped out by fossil fuels but recent studies have questioned their impact when all factors, such as the use of fertilisers on the crops, are taken into account. Critics have been angered by the loss of tropical rainforests, which have been cleared to allow farmers to grow biofuel crops.

Deforestation has been calculated to account for about 18 per cent of world greenhouse gas emissions and Professor Beddington said that to destroy rainforests in order to grow biofuel crops was “insane”. He added: “Some of the biofuels are hopeless, in the sense that the idea that you cut down rainforest to actually grow biofuels seems profoundly stupid.” He said that human ingenuity was extraordinary and he was confident that food production could be boosted, including by growing genetically modified crops.”

Alta finança ou alta vigairçe.

Irmãos que guerreiam entre si?

Parece ser o que estudo revela.

Mais uma revelação da democracia europeia:

“Members of the European parliament have rejected a draft ruling that they should publish how much they pay their staff and claim on expenses in a move set to fuel the debate over their use of taxpayers' money.”

Fraude no Parlamento Europeu

Vergonhosas declarações.

“O deputado português, que é o coordenador do Grupo do PSE (Partido dos Socialistas Europeus) defende, por outro lado, que o eurodeputado liberal britânico Chris Davis, "que actuou como deputado da extrema-direita - deve ser repreendido": "Não o devemos poupar", disse Casaca.”

“Por seu lado, o vice-presidente do PE, o também socialista português, Manuel dos Santos, membro do Painel de auditores, é da opinião de que, a pouco menos de um ano das eleições para o PE, "é natural que vários eurodeputados apostados em destruir a Europa" ponham a circular notícias deste tipo.”

“Este relatório interno só pode ser consultado pelos eurodeputados da Comissão dos Assuntos Orçamentais, num local fechado sem que estes possam tomar notas ou fazer fotocópias do documento.”

E claro como era de esperar foi votado para que o relatório, que não menciona o nome de ninguém, continue secreto.

Demonstração inequívoca do que é esta UE e os euro-deputados.

Quantos mais segredos tem esta vergonhosa Europa

Lei introdusida por Hitler em 1938, proibindo os pais de ensinarem os seus filhos em casa, tornando o ensino obrigatório nas escolas.

Por mais extranho e absurdo que pareça, a democracia alemã concorda.

Families are fleeing to the UK from Germany to escape a law introduced by Hitler that could lead to their children being taken into care if educated at home.”

“A 1938 law designed to ensure state control of all children has provoked a family exodus to Britain.”

“Hitler wanted the Nazi state to have complete control of young minds.”

A democracia acha que é para o bem da crainça...

******

Secret Report Uncovers Massive Fraud at European Parliment.

Razões porque não deve ser tornado público.

“We want reform but we cannot make this report available to the public if we want people to vote in the European elections next year.”

“The document is not secret. It is confidential. It can be read by Euro-MPs on the budget control committee, in the secret room but not generally. That is not the same as a secret document nobody can read.”

“A secret European Parliament report has uncovered "extensive, widespread and criminal abuse" by Euro-MPs of staff allowances worth almost £100 million a year.”

Ouvir Chris Davies sobre o assunto que descobriu aqui

Democracia

O processo do ex-deputado Paulo Pedroso, vai decorrer até ao fim à PORTA FECHADA.

Significa isto que, quem possívelmente terá de pagar, o Zé Povinho, não tem o direito de saber porque razão irá pagar.

Neste país, qualquer mísera réstia de esperança, quando por algum milagre se insinua, já o faz em avançado estado de putrefacção.

Expresso

A intimidade de Reinado com a ONU

Infelizmente nada de novo

Passando pelo Dragoscopio

A entrevista de Benazir Bhutto, em que ela afirma “Omar Sheikh, o homem que assassinou Osama Bin Laden...”

E este, em que imediatamente se leva acabo a destruição das provas

Os políticos não querem fazer leis que os possam queimar.

Grã-Bretanha

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3664960863576873594

USA

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7373201783240489827

Global Warming - Doomsday Called Off (1/5)


Global Warming - Doomsday Called Off (2/5)


Global Warming - Doomsday Called Off (3/5)


Global Warming - Doomsday Called Off (4/5)


Global Warming - Doomsday Called Off (5/5)


20/20 - Is there really a global warming consensus?


The Myth about Global Warming


Global Warming Hoax

Será mito ou realidade? Depois de saber que o principal impulsionador e prémio nobel, gasta 20 vezes mais electricidade numa das suas casa, que o americano médio... Qual será o objectivo de tudo isto? Impedir, como alguns dizem, que África e outros tais, se desenvolvam?

Scientists threatened for 'climate denial'

O termo "deniel" (negação) aqui tem a mesmo peso pejorativo que o "holocausto deniel"

O que tenho descoberto é que os cientistas não negam as alterações climáticas, como o aquecimento global, o que afirmam é não concordar com as conclusões catastróficas tão em voga.

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/2773

“3. The Treaty makes us all real citizens of this new European Union for the first time, instead of our being notional or honorary European "citizens" as at present:

A State must have citizens and one can only be a citizen of a State.

Citizenship of the European Union at present is stated to "complement" national citizenship, the latter being clearly primary, not least because the present EU is not a State. It is not even a corporate entity that can have individuals as members, not to mind citizens.

By transforming the legal character of the Union, the Lisbon Treaty transforms the meaning of Union citizenship. Article.17b.1 TEC/TFU replace the word "complement" in the sentence "Citizenship of the Union shall complement national citizenship", so that the new sentence reads: "Citizenship of the Union shall be in addition to national citizenship." This gives the 500 million inhabitants of the present EU Member States a real separate citizenship from citizenship of their national States for the first time. It gives a treble citizenship to citizens of Bavaria and Brandenburg within a Federal State like Germany. The rights and duties attaching to this citizenship of the new Union are be superior to those attaching to citizenship of one's own national State in any case of conflict between the two, because of the superiority of EU law over national law and constitutions.

As most States only recognise that one can have a single citizenship, henceforth it is one's Union citizenship which will be regarded by other countries as primary and superior to one's national citizenship.

Although we will be given rights as EU citizens, we should not forget that as real citizens of the new European Union we also owe it the normal citizens' duty of obedience to its laws and loyalty to its authority, which will be a higher authority than that of our national States and constitutions.

Member States retain their national constitutions, but they are subordinate to the new Union Constitution. As such they will no longer be constitutions of sovereign States, just as the various local states of the USA retain their constitutions although they are subordinate to the Federal US Constitution.”

“The Treaty underlines the subordinate role of National Parliaments in the constitutional structure of the new Union by stating that "National Parliaments shall contribute actively to the good functioning of the Union" by various means set out in Article 8c, amended TEU. The imperative "shall" implies an obligation on National Parliaments to further the interests of the new Union.... The provision of the Treaty that if one-third of the National Parliaments object to a Commission proposal, the Commission must reconsider it but not necessarily abandon it, is small compensation for the loss of democracy involved by the loss of 68 vetoes by National Parliaments as a result of other changes proposed by the Lisbon Treaty.”

“... culmination of what started nearly 60 years ago when the 1950 Schuman Declaration, which is commemorated annually on 9 May, Europe Day, proclaimed the European Coal and Steel Community to be the "first step in the federation of Europe".”

Algumas afirmações sobre o novo tratado

The difference between the original Constitution and the present Lisbon Treaty is one of approach, rather than content [...] The proposals in the original constitutional treaty are practically unchanged. They have simply been dispersed through the old treaties in the form of amendments. Why this subtle change? Above all, to head off any threat of referenda by avoiding any form of constitutional vocabulary [...] But lift the lid and look in the toolbox: all the same innovative and effective tools are there, just as they were carefully crafted by the European Convention.

Valery Giscard D'Estaing, former French President and Chairman of the Convention which drew up the EU Constitution, The Independent, London, 30 October 2007

"I think it's a bit upsetting [...] to see so many countries running away from giving their people an opportunity", Irish prime minister Bertie Ahern said on Sunday 21 October, according to the Irish Independent. 'If you believe in something [...] why not let your people have a say in it. I think the Irish people should take the opportunity to show the rest of Europe that they believe in the cause, and perhaps others shouldn't be so afraid of it,' he added."

Taoiseach Bertie Ahern, EU Observer, Brussels, 22 October 2007

They decided that the document should be unreadable. If it is unreadable, it is not constitutional, that was the sort of perception. Where they got this perception from is a mystery to me. In order to make our citizens happy, to produce a document that they will never understand! But, there is some truth [in it]. Because if this is the kind of document that the IGC will produce, any Prime Minister – imagine the UK Prime Minister – can go to the Commons and say “Look, you see, it's absolutely unreadable, it's the typical Brussels treaty, nothing new, no need for a referendum.” Should you succeed in understanding it at first sight there might be some reason for a referendum, because it would mean that there is something new.

Giuliano Amato, former Italian Prime Minister and Vice-Chairman of the Convention which drew up the EU Constitution, recorded by Open Europe, The Centre for European Reform, London, 12 July 2007

Public opinion will be led to adopt, without knowing it, the proposals that we dare not present to them directly [...] All the earlier proposals will be in the new text, but will be hidden and disguised in some way.

Valery Giscard D'Estaing, Le Monde, 14 June 2007, and Sunday Telegraph, 1 July 2007

The most striking change [between the EU Constitution in its older and newer version] is perhaps that in order to enable some governments to reassure their electorates that the changes will have no constitutional implications, the idea of a new and simpler treaty containing all the provisions governing the Union has now been dropped in favour of a huge series of individual amendments to two existing treaties. Virtual incomprehensibilty has thus replaced simplicity as the key approach to EU reform. As for the changes now proposed to be made to the constitutional treaty, most are presentational changes that have no practical effect. They have simply been designed to enable certain heads of government to sell to their people the idea of ratification by parliamentary action rather than by referendum.

Dr Garret FitzGerald, former Irish Taoiseach, Irish Times, 30 June 2007

The substance of the constitution is preserved.That is a fact.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel, speech in the European Parliament, 27 June 2007

The good thing is that all the symbolic elements are gone, and that which really matters – the core – is left.

Anders Fogh Rasmussen, Danish Prime Minister, Jyllands-Posten, 25 June 2007

The substance of what was agreed in 2004 has been retained. What is gone is the term “constitution.”

Dermot Ahern, Irish Foreign Minister, Daily Mail Ireland, 25 June 2007

90 per cent of it is still there [...] These changes haven't made any dramatic change to the substance of what was agreed back in 2004.

Irish Taoiseach Bertie Ahern, Irish Independent, 24 June 2007

The aim of the Constitutional Treaty was to be more readable; the aim of this treaty is to be unreadable [...] The Constitution aimed to be clear, whereas this treaty had to be unclear. It is a success.

Karel De Gucht, Belgian Foreign Minister, Flanders Info, 23 June 2007

The good thing about not calling it a Constitution is that no one can ask for a referendum on it.

Giuliano Amato, speech at London School of Econmics, 21 February 2007

Referendums make the process of approval of European treaties much more complicated and less predictable [...] I was in favour of a referendum as a prime minister, but it does make our lives with 27 member states in the EU much more difficult. If a referendum had to be held on the creation of the European Community or the introduction of the euro, do you think these would have passed?

Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso, Irish Times, 8 Feb.2007; quoting remarks in Het Financieele Dagblad and De Volkskrant, Holland; also quoted in EUobserver, 6 February 2007

Muammar Kadhafi

“Durante a sua intervenção, de cerca de 50 minutos, o líbio defendeu a proibição do uso de armamento nuclear se este for uma ameaça para a vida humana, e que ainda não começou a terceira guerra mundial, porque «há um receio em relação ao nuclear e isso é perturbador».”